ISO 27001 Annex A guide

ISO 27001 Annex A 6.6: Confidentiality or non-disclosure agreements

Use suitable confidentiality commitments that reflect information sensitivity, roles, jurisdictions and relationship lifecycle. This independent guide turns that purpose into practical ownership, operating evidence and auditor-ready testing.

Control
6.6
Category
People controls
Primary outcome
Use suitable confidentiality commitments that reflect information sensitivity, roles, jurisdictions and relationship lifecycle.

What Control 6.6 means in practice

Use suitable confidentiality commitments that reflect information sensitivity, roles, jurisdictions and relationship lifecycle. Test the control through the organisation's actual scope, decisions, ownership and operating records rather than relying on a policy reference alone.

For confidentiality or non-disclosure agreements, proportional design depends on the affected services, information, people and dependencies. The evidence below should be adapted to that real boundary.

Implementation steps

  1. Step 1. Define ownership, scope and operating criteria for confidentiality or non-disclosure agreements.
  2. Step 2. Implement people-security process that fits the organization’s risks, services and working practices.
  3. Step 3. Integrate the activity with relevant change, exception and review processes.
  4. Step 4. Review performance and improve the arrangement when risks, technology or obligations change.

What good implementation looks like

  • recent samples show confidentiality or non-disclosure agreements operating across the intended scope
  • exceptions and adverse results have accountable decisions and verified closure
  • review results lead to measurable correction or improvement

Implementation evidence and effectiveness evidence

Evidence the control is implemented

  • approved people-security process
  • personnel records
  • assigned ownership and approval evidence
  • sample implementation, review and exception records

Evidence the control is effective

  • recent samples show confidentiality or non-disclosure agreements operating across the intended scope
  • exceptions and adverse results have accountable decisions and verified closure
  • review results lead to measurable correction or improvement

How an auditor may test Control 6.6

  1. Select a representative in-scope service, asset or process.
  2. Confirm the accountable owner and expected operation.
  3. Trace a recent example: A workforce lifecycle event is sampled to confirm responsibilities, communication, records and timely follow-up.
  4. Inspect the operating record and corroborating technical evidence.
  5. Compare the design with evidence that the control operated effectively.
  6. Follow an exception or adverse result through decision and closure.
  7. Review trends, metrics and improvement decisions.

Questions to prepare for

  • How is confidentiality or non-disclosure agreements implemented in practice?
  • Who owns the activity and how are decisions approved?
  • Show me a recent example from operation through review.
  • How are exceptions, changes or overdue actions handled?

Practical examples

Example 1

A workforce lifecycle event is sampled to confirm responsibilities, communication, records and timely follow-up.

Example 2

For confidentiality or non-disclosure agreements, the owner reviews a recent exception or adverse result, records the risk-based decision and follows action through closure.

Example 3

A representative in-scope service is sampled to confirm that documented expectations for confidentiality or non-disclosure agreements match current operation.

Illustrative decision and evidence record

Control outcomeUse suitable confidentiality commitments that reflect information sensitivity, roles, jurisdictions and relationship lifecycle.
Illustrative activityA workforce lifecycle event is sampled to confirm responsibilities, communication, records and timely follow-up.
Evidence sampleapproved people-security process
Effectiveness signalrecent samples show confidentiality or non-disclosure agreements operating across the intended scope
Auditor questionHow is confidentiality or non-disclosure agreements implemented in practice?
Failure to challengedocumenting confidentiality or non-disclosure agreements without consistent operation

Reviewer note: Test confidentiality or non-disclosure agreements with a recent real example; a current operating record normally reveals more than policy wording alone.

Useful performance and coverage measures

  • in-scope coverage for confidentiality or non-disclosure agreements
  • overdue exceptions or actions by age
  • repeat findings identified through review

Approach for smaller and mature organizations

Smaller organization

Use a clear owner, a proportionate working record, built-in platform capability and a scheduled review. Sample real activity instead of creating duplicate paperwork for confidentiality or non-disclosure agreements.

Mature or complex organization

Define service-level ownership, automated coverage reporting, integrated workflow, risk-based exceptions and independent assurance across business units and technology platforms.

Practical implementation checklist

  • □ Define ownership, scope and operating criteria for confidentiality or non-disclosure agreements.
  • □ Implement people-security process that fits the organization’s risks, services and working practices.
  • □ Integrate the activity with relevant change, exception and review processes.
  • □ Review performance and improve the arrangement when risks, technology or obligations change.
  • □ Sample evidence has been checked for operation and effectiveness.
  • □ Exceptions have owners, rationale, review dates and closure evidence.

Common implementation mistakes

  • documenting confidentiality or non-disclosure agreements without consistent operation
  • unclear ownership or review frequency
  • evidence that does not cover the full ISMS scope
  • exceptions accepted without risk-based approval or follow-up

Frequently asked questions

What evidence is useful for Control 6.6?

Use the approved approach, accountable ownership and recent operating records. Corroborate these with technical, business or review evidence relevant to confidentiality or non-disclosure agreements.

How often should confidentiality or non-disclosure agreements be reviewed?

Set a risk-based cadence and add event-driven review after material business, technology, threat or obligation changes.

Does ISO 27001 prescribe one tool or method?

No. Select proportionate methods that achieve the control outcome and can be demonstrated in operation.

Use the interactive control lookup

Open Control 6.6 in the free tool to browse connected controls and practical evidence alongside the complete reference set.

Open Control 6.6 in the Annex A lookup →